7.08.2004

Ann Coulter's latest

In Desperate Move, Kerry Adopts Puppy
July 7, 2004

I guess with John Kerry's choice of John Edwards as his running mate, he really does want to stand up for all Americans, from those worth only $60 million to those worth in excess of $800 million.

In one of the many stratagems Democrats have developed to avoid telling people what they believe, all Edwards wants to talk about is his cracker-barrel humble origins story. We're supposed to swoon over his "life story," as the flacks say, which apparently consists of the amazing fact that ... his father was a millworker!

That's right up there with "Clinton's stepdad was a drunk" and "Ted Kennedy's dad was a womanizing bootlegger" on my inspirational life-stories meter. In fact, I'm immediately renouncing my university degrees and going to work for the post office just to give my future children a shot at having a "life story," should they decide to run for president someday.

What is so amazing about Edwards' father being a millworker? That's at least an honorable occupation -- as opposed to being a trial lawyer. True, Edwards made more money than his father did. I assume strippers make more money than their alcoholic fathers who abandoned them did, too. This isn't a story of progress; it's a story of devolution.

Despite the overwrought claims of Edwards' dazzling legal skills, winning jury verdicts in personal injury cases has nothing to do with legal talent and everything to do with getting the right cases -- unless "talent" is taken to mean "having absolutely no shame." Edwards specialized in babies with cerebral palsy whom he claimed would have been spared the affliction if only the doctors had immediately performed Caesarean sections.

As a result of such lawsuits, there are now more than four times as many Caesarean sections as there were in 1970. But curiously, there has been no change in the rate of babies born with cerebral palsy. As The New York Times reported: "Studies indicate that in most cases, the disorder is caused by fetal brain injury long before labor begins." All those Caesareans have, however, increased the mother's risk of death, hemorrhage, infection, pulmonary embolism and Mendelson's syndrome.

In addition, the "little guys" Edwards claims to represent are having a lot more trouble finding doctors to deliver their babies these days as obstetricians leave the practice rather than pay malpractice insurance in excess of $100,000 a year.

In one of Edwards' silver-tongued arguments to the jury on behalf of a girl born with cerebral palsy, he claimed he was channeling the unborn baby girl, Jennifer Campbell, who was speaking to the jurors through him:

"She said at 3, 'I'm fine.' She said at 4, 'I'm having a little trouble, but I'm doing OK.' Five, she said, 'I'm having problems.' At 5:30, she said, 'I need out.'"

She's saying, "My lawyer needs a new Jaguar ... "

"She speaks to you through me and I have to tell you right now -- I didn't plan to talk about this -- right now I feel her. I feel her presence. She's inside me, and she's talking to you."

Well, tell her to pipe down, would you? I'm trying to hear the evidence in a malpractice lawsuit.

To paraphrase Oscar Wilde on the death of Little Nell, one must have a heart of stone to read this without laughing. What is this guy, a tent-show preacher? An off-the-strip Las Vegas lounge psychic couldn't get away with this routine.

Is Edwards able to channel any children right before an abortionist's fork is plunged into their tiny skulls? Why can't he hear those babies saying, "Let me live! Stop spraying this saline solution all over me!" Edwards must experience interference in channeling the voices of babies about to be aborted. Their liberal mothers' hands seem to muffle those voices.

And may we ask what the pre-born Jennifer Campbell thinks about war with Iraq? North Korea? Marginal tax rates? If Miss Cleo here is going to be a heartbeat away from the presidency, I think the voters are entitled to know that.

While making himself fabulously rich by taking a one-third cut of his multimillion-dollar verdicts coaxed out of juries with junk science and maudlin performances, Edwards has the audacity to claim, "I was more than just their lawyer; I cared about them. Their cause was my cause."

If he cared so deeply, how about keeping just 10 percent of the multimillion-dollar jury awards, rather than a third? In fact, as long as these Democrats are so eager to raise the taxes of "the rich," how about a 90 percent tax on contingency fees?

For someone who didn't care about the money, it's interesting that Edwards avoided cases in which the baby died during delivery. Evidently, jury awards average only about $500,000 when the babies die, and there is no disabled child to parade before the jury.

Edwards was one of the leading opponents of a bill in the North Carolina Legislature that would have established a fund for all babies born with cerebral palsy. So instead of all disabled babies in North Carolina being compensated equitably, only a few will win the jury lottery -- one-third of which will go to trial lawyers like Edwards, who insists he doesn't care about the money.

Despite the now-disproved junk science theory about C-sections preventing cerebral palsy that Edwards peddled in the channeling case, the jury awarded Edwards' client a record-breaking $6.5 million. This is the essence of the modern Democratic Party, polished to perfection by Bill Clinton: They are willing to insult the intelligence of 49 percent of the people if they think they can fool 51 percent of the people.

So while Michael Moore, Al Franken, George Soros, Crazy Al Gore and the rest of the characters from the climactic devil-worshipping scene in "Rosemary's Baby" provide the muscle for the Kerry campaign, Kerry picks a pretty-boy milquetoast as his running mate, narrowly edging out a puppy for the spot. Just don't ask the Democrats what they believe. Edwards' father was a millworker, and that's all you need to know.

Ann Coulter.org

The real John Kerry

Go here to read quotes from real men who served in Vietnam, some alongside of this great pretender. I just read it, and I am flabbergasted. I'm way past flabbergasted. This guy is the most self-serving, manipulative little hypocrite I have ever seen. It's not like I didn't know that already, but this really brought it home. God help us if the foolish amongst us are a large enough number to elect this mongrel. It is just incredible how gullible so many people are who question an honorable, decent, courageous man like George Bush, and swallow every drop of poison from the mouth of this charlatan like it's the elixir of life.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

7.07.2004

Remember folks, you heard it here second

Drudge dredged this story from a Scandinavian newspaper about this band playing in Oslo that likes to get controversial. Their idiot leader yells "How far are you willing to go to save the world?," and two people come onstage, strip, and have sex, all in the name of saving the "rainforest". Seems they belong to some environmentalist wacko group called, (now, hang on to your frozen yogurts), "Fuck for Forest", who have sex in public in order to put focus on the "rainforest". Oh, yeah--the band's name is Cumshot.

Lovely.

Deja Vu all over again

Here's another ridiculous story, except this time a pompous judge enters the picture, or rather, several, being the Louisiana Supreme Court. Who do these assholes think they are? "In the twenty-first century, it is simply archaic to cite protection of women from the sights and sounds of a locker room environment as an excuse for excluding them from the public dining area as it exists in this country club," Justice John L. Weimer wrote for the unanimous court. This is a PRIVATE club, public dining area or not. Whether these guys want to break their own rules (dress code) is irrelevant. There have to be a lot of women's private clubs out there. You don't hear anybody screaming discrimination over that. What a bunch of doo-doo.

7.05.2004

How the mighty have fallen


7.04.2004


Iraqi National Guard and U.S. troops watch fireworks in Tikrit

7.03.2004

A fraud has been perpetuated on the American people


Look at this picture of "John Kerry". Now, look at the picture below of actor Harry Dean Stanton, excellent portrayer of creepy guys in movies. Now, I ask you, ladies and gentlemen--if you can tell me the difference, then I'm Zoltan, King of gypsies. There IS no John Kerry! We've been lied to! It's a vast left-wing conspiracy! Call the ACLU!


Move over Kournikova


And this one can PLAY!

7.02.2004

And now, for something completely different

You won't believe this.

Cosby breaks bad


Bill Cosby lashed out at young blacks at a Rainbow Coalition shindig yesterday, which I'm sure will cause a stir amongst the brothas. What he was doing hanging out with race warlord Jesse Jackson is beyond me, but you can find the story here.

6.30.2004

"Wake up, Maggie, I think I got somethin' to say to you..."

Since there seemed to be a moderate amount of interest (and quite a flap about one in particular) in my "literature logs" from English Comp class, here I post my final entry from that hollowed omnibus.

I forget the exact context of this quote, but it must have had something to do with the idea that men and women are equal in every aspect, which is, of course, horse hockey. Following are the quote, and my reaction.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“In the double standard of friendship, for once the female version was becoming accepted as the general idea.”

From “The Tapestry of Friendship” by Ellen Goodman

My question is “Why does there have to be a ‘general idea’?” Once again—now, read my lips—women and men are different. Why is this so not ok with so many women? Men are logical; women are emotional. Of course, there are always exceptions to every rule. Must I make a disclaimer every time a definitive statement is made, just to keep some nitwit from being up in arms? Seems so, these days. But, I digress.
I just don’t get why there has to be a “war of the sexes” because men and women are different. I say, vive la difference! I like women. I’m glad they’re different. I like women who like men. If we’re different, then let’s pool our strengths and become a team.
It seems to me that a desire to reverse a wrong and be on top is at the heart of feminism, not a desire for equality. Men have wrongfully lorded it over women, so now they just want to turn the tables. Hell, that’s no fun! And I didn’t do it. We’re not all guilty, you know, just because we have a penis. Hmmm. That brings up another point. Could the “battle” have something to do with penis envy? I wonder…

Powered by Blogger